Comme des milliers de personnes, recevez gratuitement chaque semaine << Forum anglais: Questions sur l'anglais || En bas
woman welcomes/correction
Message de gagou940 posté le 28-12-2009 à 17:50:18 (S | E | F)
bonjour j'ai un devoir a faire a partir d'un texte. je ne vous mets pas le texte car il a peu d'importance mais pourriez vous m'aider a corriger mon devoir ou du moins m'expliquer les plus grosses erreures , je viens de reprendre l'anglais apres 3 ans de pose et je crains d'etre serieusement rouillié!!!
merci
This article entitled “woman welcomes’ right to die’ ruling” was published on BBC website on the Twenty three in March two thousand and two.
It is about a totally paralyzed lady who asks the English justice to let her die with dignity.
This lady became paralyzed because of a vascular accident. She can breathe only with a machine. She refused the treatment but the doctors it imposed on her. She has of act in justice to make recognize her right to refuse the treatment. That is the machine to breathe. She gained but the doctor’s dispute. They want of time to improve her life and make it change opinion.
It is not normal whom a person is to oblige to act in justice to make respect its rights. Furthermore, a law forces the doctors normally to respect the decision of the patient for the treatment, even if it leads the patient to the death. The problem comes from the comparison with the euthanasia. Because here, it is necessary to put out the machine this maintains her alive. But if the doctors had not imposed on her dices the beginning the machine, the question would not arise.
-------------------
Modifié par bridg le 28-12-2009 18:30
titre
Message de gagou940 posté le 28-12-2009 à 17:50:18 (S | E | F)
bonjour j'ai un devoir a faire a partir d'un texte. je ne vous mets pas le texte car il a peu d'importance mais pourriez vous m'aider a corriger mon devoir ou du moins m'expliquer les plus grosses erreures , je viens de reprendre l'anglais apres 3 ans de pose et je crains d'etre serieusement rouillié!!!
merci
This article entitled “woman welcomes’ right to die’ ruling” was published on BBC website on the Twenty three in March two thousand and two.
It is about a totally paralyzed lady who asks the English justice to let her die with dignity.
This lady became paralyzed because of a vascular accident. She can breathe only with a machine. She refused the treatment but the doctors it imposed on her. She has of act in justice to make recognize her right to refuse the treatment. That is the machine to breathe. She gained but the doctor’s dispute. They want of time to improve her life and make it change opinion.
It is not normal whom a person is to oblige to act in justice to make respect its rights. Furthermore, a law forces the doctors normally to respect the decision of the patient for the treatment, even if it leads the patient to the death. The problem comes from the comparison with the euthanasia. Because here, it is necessary to put out the machine this maintains her alive. But if the doctors had not imposed on her dices the beginning the machine, the question would not arise.
-------------------
Modifié par bridg le 28-12-2009 18:30
titre
Réponse: woman welcomes/correction de seb06000, postée le 28-12-2009 à 18:52:43 (S | E)
bonjour,
je vous laisse les indications de correction
This article entitled “woman welcomes’ right to die’ ruling” was published on BBC website on the Twenty three in March two thousand and two.
It is about a totally paralyzed lady who asks the English justice to let her die with dignity.
This lady became paralyzed because of a vascular accident. She can breathe only with a machine. She refused the treatment but the doctors it imposed on her. She has of act in justice (voc) to make( je mettrais 'to have', to make a un autre sens) recognize her right( le COD est accolé au verbe) to refuse the treatment. That is the machine to breathe. She gained( voc) but the doctor’s dispute (voc) . They want of( préposition inutile) time to improve her life and make it( pronom possessif à revoir) change opinion.
It is not normal whom( voc) a person is to oblige to act in justice( structure à revoir) to make respect its rights( COD à replacer) . Furthermore, a law forces the doctors normally to respect the decision of the patient for the treatment, even if it leads the patient to the ( article inutile, il s'agit du concept) death. The problem comes from the comparison with the (idem) euthanasia. Because here, it is necessary to put out the machine this( il faut un relatif) maintains her alive. But if the doctors had not imposed on her dices ( sens?) the beginning the machine, the question would not arise.
Voilà il reste peut-être des choses à revoir!
Amicalement
sébastien
Réponse: woman welcomes/correction de gagou940, postée le 28-12-2009 à 19:20:50 (S | E)
je te remercie !!! je vais chercher sur le site les correction ca me fera de bonne révision !!!!!!!
meme si j'ai du mal avec les cod LOl !!
Réponse: woman welcomes/correction de seb06000, postée le 28-12-2009 à 20:31:25 (S | E)
pas de souci
J'oubliais: " to have her right respected', il faut une forme en ED sur la base verbale car c'est un sens passif => faire faire quelque chose par quelqu'un...
Voilà j'espère que cela vous aide!
Amicalement
sébastien
Réponse: woman welcomes/correction de gagou940, postée le 02-01-2010 à 10:28:11 (S | E)
Merci !!!!
This article entitled “woman welcomes’ right to die’ ruling” was published on BBC website on the Twenty three in March two thousand and two.
It is about a totally paralyzed lady who asks the English justice to let her die with dignity, because she was connected to a machine against her opinion.
This lady became paralyzed because of a vascular accident. She can breathe only with a machine. If she has no machine, she dies. She refused the treatment but the doctors it imposed on her. She has of act in justice to have recognize right her to refuse the treatment. That is the machine to breathe. She won but the doctors dispute the decision. They want time to improve her life and make her change opinion. They think of finding a means to help him to live better.
It is not normal that a person is to oblige to take legal proceedings to make respect rights its. Furthermore, a law forces the doctors normally to respect the decision of the patient for the treatment, even if it leads the patient to death. The problem comes from the comparison with euthanasia. Because here, it is necessary to put out the machine which maintains her alive. It has to give the impression to commit a murder. But if the doctors had not imposed dices the beginning the machine, the question would not arise.
-------------------
Modifié par lucile83 le 02-01-2010 10:38
+ Topics fusionnés;merci de continuer sur le topic déjà ouvert quand il s'agit du même sujet.
<< Forum anglais: Questions sur l'anglais
INDISPENSABLES : 